Re: why CRUX has "sh -> bash" symbolic link concept

arnuld wrote:

i notice that my ".bashrc" and ".bash_profile" files just do not work and then i see i am no longer running BASH but "sh". then i notice, there is no "sh" , "/bin/sh" is just a symbolic link to BASH. i know and i can solve my problem using "chsh -s bash user" but i want to know why CRUX uses "sh -> bash" symbolic link instead of simply using "/bin/bash" as default shell.

It's pretty common to have /bin/sh be a symlink to /bin/bash, but the question should be, why are you using /bin/sh as a shell?