*Oleksiy V. Khilkevich: | On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:56:50 +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote: | IMO, the distro can be called CRUX, but anyway it is still GNU/Linux Yes, it is called CRUX. | On gnu.org (I don't remember where), Stallman stresses that the kernel is | not Linux but GNU/Linux, that undelines the nature of kernel. I thought the kernel was Linux, and everything else GNU? That's why Stallman insists on calling combinations of GNU tools with Linux kernels GNU/Linux. I could also argue that some distros should rather be called X/Linux or KDE/Linux by the same argument. | Anyway it's a hard matter to operate :) | Basically for me, I agree with Stallman and call distro either CRUX or | CRUX GNU/Linux where acceptable. CRUX was named CRUX, not Crux GNU/Linux, by it's creator. You can argue as long as you want if you want to call it a GNU/Linux distro or a Linux distro, but please take that row elsewhere. -- Robert Bauck Hamar Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.