Hi, I've noticed that many of the recent port adoptions in opt and core have only changed the Maintainer: field and not added a Packager: field for the previous maintainer. In the past I've also noticed a bunch of commits pretty much randomly changing those fields, in particular some of sten's (danm's previous) ports. Personally I've always wondered what that sort of useless information is doing in an otherwise sparse system like CRUX ports. Sure, the creator of the port could get some credit, but really, creating a port is usually a matter of seconds for the autotools-based ones, minutes for others (in general) and a couple of hours for the really tricky/polished ones. I also tend to think that the Maintainer: field could be left out and a repo-wide contact address be used instead (being a virtual one for repos with multiple maintainers) - but it does make sense for 'contrib' in its current form, at least, so lets leave that out for today. Anyway, it'd be nice to reach some consensus and see some consistency with the use of that field. Is the info useful? Could it be located elsewhere, e.g. commit messages? If not, wouldn't (multiple) Contributor: fields make more sense, or will there always be at most 2 people contributing to a port?