![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a21a2b39bf7bcec3953d52a83d99ecd0.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 10/13/06 16:59 Mark Rosenstand wrote:
Actually I think lynx is (also) in opt as Nick correctly reports. It's going to be dropped in a couple of days anyway.
... again, apparently:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1226 | sten | 2006-04-12 05:27:28 +0200 (Wed, 12 Apr 2006) | 1 line Changed paths: D /attic/lynx A /crux-2.2/ports/opt/lynx (from /attic/lynx:1126) M /crux-2.2/ports/opt/lynx/Pkgfile
lynx: adopt port ------------------------------------------------------------------------
And no, I wasn't notified when that happened. Would have been nice.
Sure. Only please have a look at what's going on before dubbing reported problems as user errors. Apart from that, I suggest contrib maintainers to check for dups from time to time (ie with prt-get dup) so you can promptly detect 'masked' ports. Regards, Simone -- Simone Rota Bergamo, Italy - http://www.varlock.com