Jesse Kokkarinen ha scritto:
It is implied that a user can optimize / configure the base system to their required specifications. The kicker being that the user is responsible for maintaining the system, not the official crux maintainers, at least if the settings differ significantly from what is provided. The devs are only supposed to produce a base system and the most common software, from where the user continues and expands as needed.
A few of the crux "ports" you refer to are already linked [1]. They are unofficial and do not fall under the responsibility of crux itself. This has the potential to cause unnecessary confusion _IF_ they were displayed more prominently. I would consider this to directly fall into place with the user finding what is needed and without relying on something or someone to hold their hand during the process.
the _real_ question is: why are these unofficial projects yet? we can join the teams and choose a common way to develop distros' ports, a multiarch port system, and so on... feel free to not agree with it, but: crux users are not only i686... Regards -- bisco at cruxppc dot org CRUX PPC Team! [http://cruxppc.sunsite.dk]