Hello, Jesse. On Sat, 27 May 2006 15:29:33 +0300 Jesse Kokkarinen <jesse.kokkarinen@kapsi.fi> wrote:
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
Which is why I suggest a trunk and branches. After all, most users (including myself on certain boxen) share your view, but the new versions *do* need testing (and the more testing, the better.)
Now I understand what you meant, however it seems like it would be quite difficult since CRUX is not particularily rich in user resources. You could say CRUX has "outsourced" testing software, and then once results have been either positive or negative, would it be incorporated or left out. It just seems it would turn into a user, non-officially sanctioned project.
That is what I am afraid of. I can't really disagree with Mark, but just can't leave this problem out... -- Mikhail Kolesnik ICQ: 260259143 IRC: mike_k at freenode/#crux, rusnet/#yalta Jabber: mike_k@jabber.lafox.net NIC handle: MKK83-UANIC