to whom it may concern: contrib/ntp 4.2.4p0 fails is old and fails (due to download link). following patch also adds url-fix which would allow ntp to compile even if it is outdated. fikin fileserver@root:/usr/ports/contrib/ntp (10:05:38) (266): diff -Naur Pkgfile.orig Pkgfile --- Pkgfile.orig 2007-08-14 12:53:19.000000000 +0000 +++ Pkgfile 2007-08-14 12:54:55.000000000 +0000 @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ # Depends on: openssl name=ntp -version=4.2.4p0 +version=4.2.4p3 release=1 -source=(http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/$name-$version.tar.gz +source=( http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-4.2/$name-$version.tar.gz ntpd ntp.conf) fileserver@root:/usr/ports/contrib/ntp (10:05:44) (267):
to whom it may concern: The one it should concern in this case is James Mills, aka prologic,
On 13:06 Tue 14 Aug?, fikin wrote: listed as Maintainer in the Pkgfile. Generally, if you have problem with a port, try contacting this person as the first option, or _in cases where this applies_, file a bug at crux.nu. Ie, do *not* file bugs you found in some individuals repo here, for instance. // treach
fikin [2007-08-14 21:20]:
Generally, if you have problem with a port, try contacting this person as the first option, or _in cases where this applies_, file a bug at
who is the general maintainer of contrib repo and what is the difference with core and opt then?
Does this http://crux.nu/Main/Handbook2-3#ntoc36 answer your questions? For general problems with contrib you can write to the crux-contrib mailing list. There's no single person who's responsible for all of the ports in contrib though. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
participants (3)
-
fikin -
Tilman Sauerbeck -
treach