Hi Compile error : libmpfr => Pkgfile touch doc/mpfr.info ??? ncurses => Pkgfile missing \ for --whiteout-test Greeting Milan -- Remember, no question is too stupid and no problem too small--We've all been beginners
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:54:25 +0000 Milan Buška wrote:
Hi
Compile error :
libmpfr => Pkgfile touch doc/mpfr.info ??? ncurses => Pkgfile missing \ for --whiteout-test
Greeting
Milan
No offence, but I receieved spam emails that made more sense than this :) Read this[1], if you haven't already, and come back,, please. [1]http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#bespecific Pedja
Please accept my apology. I just wanted to point out the error. Next time I will not. Milan 2015-08-26 17:35 GMT+00:00 Predrag Ivanovic <predivan@mts.rs>:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:54:25 +0000 Milan Buška wrote:
Hi
Compile error :
libmpfr => Pkgfile touch doc/mpfr.info ??? ncurses => Pkgfile missing \ for --whiteout-test
Greeting
Milan
No offence, but I receieved spam emails that made more sense than this :)
Read this[1], if you haven't already, and come back,, please.
[1]http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#bespecific
Pedja _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu https://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux
-- Remember, no question is too stupid and no problem too small--We've all been beginners
On 2015-08-26 03:54, Milan Buška wrote:
Hi
Compile error :
libmpfr => Pkgfile touch doc/mpfr.info [1] ??? ncurses => Pkgfile missing \ for --whiteout-test
Regarding libmpfr, I assume this was done to avoid requiring texinfo or other packages, not to require it. As for ncurses, I agree this syntax looks odd and inconsistent but the compile still works fine as the configure options are quoted anyway, making the backslashes unnecessary. Regards, Matt
participants (3)
-
Matt Housh -
Milan Buška -
Predrag Ivanovic