Since CRUX 2.4 is around the corner, I figured I'd tell everyone that OpenSSL 0.9.8 will cause illegal hardware instruction errors without this patch: http://pred.dcaf-security.org/openssl-0.9.8-gcc42.patch. I would suggest adding this to the 2.4 branch, otherwise any app depending on openssl will fail to run ;) -- ~predatorfreak GnuPG Public key: http://pred.dcaf-security.org/dcafsec-pub-gpgkey.asc
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:29:48PM -0400, Brett Goulder wrote: Hi Brett,
Since CRUX 2.4 is around the corner, I figured I'd tell everyone that OpenSSL 0.9.8 will cause illegal hardware instruction errors without this patch: http://pred.dcaf-security.org/openssl-0.9.8-gcc42.patch.
many thanks for the info and the patch, though we have have no decision yet whether we will use gcc 4.2 for CRUX 2.4 or stick with 4.1. Anyway, patching openssl with non-official patches isn't that funny at all and using the different one from debian [1] might be an option. regards Juergen [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429740 -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:00:58 +0200 Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:29:48PM -0400, Brett Goulder wrote:
Hi Brett,
Since CRUX 2.4 is around the corner, I figured I'd tell everyone that OpenSSL 0.9.8 will cause illegal hardware instruction errors without this patch: http://pred.dcaf-security.org/openssl-0.9.8-gcc42.patch.
many thanks for the info and the patch, though we have have no decision yet whether we will use gcc 4.2 for CRUX 2.4 or stick with 4.1.
Anyway, patching openssl with non-official patches isn't that funny at all and using the different one from debian [1] might be an option.
regards Juergen
Sorry, I was not aware of that patch from OpenSSL upstream, I was merely grabbing a patch from the sources I normally find patches (Arch Linux, Gentoo). -- ~predatorfreak GnuPG Public key: http://pred.dcaf-security.org/dcafsec-pub-gpgkey.asc
participants (2)
-
Brett Goulder -
Juergen Daubert