question regarding "depends on core"
In port guidelines, there's a remark about not listing depends that are in core, but from what I can see, most Pkgfiles (in core or not) do so (and it's probably better this way - of course glibc is universally excluded). Just to be sure - what is the current stance on the subject ?
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:24:56PM +0100, Michal Soltys wrote:
In port guidelines, there's a remark about not listing depends that are in core, but from what I can see, most Pkgfiles (in core or not) do so (and it's probably better this way - of course glibc is universally excluded).
Just to be sure - what is the current stance on the subject ?
See http://crux.nu/Main/PortGuidelines, the two essential points are: - We list all runtime dependencies except for gcc (libstdc++) and glibc - run-time dependencies from core which aren't dynamically linked in are not to be listed Greetings Juergen -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux
participants (2)
-
Juergen Daubert -
Michal Soltys