Re: License for core/rc package
Dominic, The CRUX Pkgfiles and ports are under the GNU GPL, see here: https://crux.nu/Main/Handbook3-1#ntoc7 In the case of rc, presumably the entire thing would be under the GPL including the built package since all of the code for it resides in the ports tree. As for making it less ambiguous, that will happen in CRUX 3.2. I filed a bug to include License and Copyright files in the root directory of each official ports tree (core, opt, xorg, compat-32), and this has been responded to and fixed in the 3.2 git repo. -Alan Beadle (mechaniputer) On 8/7/15, Dominic Jones <jonesd@xmission.com> wrote:
Good morning. Looking through the source code of the core/rc package, I noted the absence of a license (and a copyright, for that matter). What is the license on this package? Might it be good to include whatever the license is in the package somehow?
-- Dominic Jones <jonesd@xmission.com> _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu https://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux
Technically, the handbook says that the "package build scripts" in those repositories are under the GPL. So, it wasn't obvious to me that the rc scripts would be included. Clarifying that might be an enhancement. Dominic On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:11:50 -0400 Herbert Beadle <beadleha@clarkson.edu> wrote:
participants (2)
-
Dominic Jones
-
Herbert Beadle