Re: [CRUX][#235] prt-get depinst pinentry fiails to build, missing X11
CRUX wrote:
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#235 - prt-get depinst pinentry fiails to build, missing X11 User who did this - Simon Gloßner (Viper)
---------- Ok, I'll add this dependency. Totally forgotten this bug report. :-) ----------
My gawd so this means that if i wanna use prt-get depinst ketchup on my SERVER it'll pull in xorg for a SERVER not bright at all, and not happy. Yet another stupid decision. I'll maintain my own copy.
More information can be found at the following URL: http://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=235#comment433
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
Regards, Danny Rawlins
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:30:54 +1000 Danny Rawlins <monster.romster@gmail.com> wrote:
CRUX wrote:
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#235 - prt-get depinst pinentry fiails to build, missing X11 User who did this - Simon Gloßner (Viper)
---------- Ok, I'll add this dependency. Totally forgotten this bug report. :-) ----------
My gawd so this means that if i wanna use prt-get depinst ketchup on my SERVER it'll pull in xorg for a SERVER not bright at all, and not happy. Yet another stupid decision. I'll maintain my own copy.
More information can be found at the following URL: http://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=235#comment433
Is it stupid that pintentry depends on X11? Yes. Is Simon stupid for adding it as a dependency? No. Distro patching is a bad thing (tm) Sounds like an upstream bug, has anyone contacted the upstream developers? -- Lucas Hazel <lucas@die.net.au>
Hi, On Wednesday, 25. June 2008 04:30:54 Danny Rawlins wrote:
My gawd so this means that if i wanna use prt-get depinst ketchup on my SERVER it'll pull in xorg for a SERVER not bright at all, and not happy. Yet another stupid decision. I'll maintain my own copy.
I've understood that. I proposed to create a pinentry-curse or pinentry-nox11 port with --enable-embedded. Just commenting the testing for X stuff out of the configure script isn't a good thing. Regards
Simon Gloßner wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 25. June 2008 04:30:54 Danny Rawlins wrote:
My gawd so this means that if i wanna use prt-get depinst ketchup on my SERVER it'll pull in xorg for a SERVER not bright at all, and not happy. Yet another stupid decision. I'll maintain my own copy.
I've understood that. I proposed to create a pinentry-curse or pinentry-nox11 port with --enable-embedded. Just commenting the testing for X stuff out of the configure script isn't a good thing.
I have made my own set. http://romster.dyndns.org:8080/linux/ports/crux/romster-opt/pinentry-curses/ http://romster.dyndns.org:8080/linux/ports/crux/romster-opt/pinentry-gtk/ http://romster.dyndns.org:8080/linux/ports/crux/romster-opt/pinentry-qt3/
Regards _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux
Regards, Danny Rawlins
Danny Rawlins [2008-06-25 12:30]:
CRUX wrote:
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#235 - prt-get depinst pinentry fiails to build, missing X11 User who did this - Simon Gloßner (Viper)
---------- Ok, I'll add this dependency. Totally forgotten this bug report. :-) ----------
My gawd so this means that if i wanna use prt-get depinst ketchup on my SERVER it'll pull in xorg for a SERVER not bright at all, and not happy. Yet another stupid decision. I'll maintain my own copy.
libx11 does NOT pull in xorg (as in the server). See 'prt-get deptree xorg-libx11', kthx. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Danny Rawlins [2008-06-25 12:30]:
CRUX wrote:
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#235 - prt-get depinst pinentry fiails to build, missing X11 User who did this - Simon Gloßner (Viper)
---------- Ok, I'll add this dependency. Totally forgotten this bug report. :-) ----------
My gawd so this means that if i wanna use prt-get depinst ketchup on my SERVER it'll pull in xorg for a SERVER not bright at all, and not happy. Yet another stupid decision. I'll maintain my own copy.
libx11 does NOT pull in xorg (as in the server). See 'prt-get deptree xorg-libx11', kthx.
Fine libx11 then and all of it's dependents.
Regards, Tilman
Regards, Danny Rawlins
Danny Rawlins [2008-06-26 03:47]:
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Danny Rawlins [2008-06-25 12:30]:
CRUX wrote:
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#235 - prt-get depinst pinentry fiails to build, missing X11 User who did this - Simon Gloßner (Viper)
---------- Ok, I'll add this dependency. Totally forgotten this bug report. :-) ----------
My gawd so this means that if i wanna use prt-get depinst ketchup on my SERVER it'll pull in xorg for a SERVER not bright at all, and not happy. Yet another stupid decision. I'll maintain my own copy.
libx11 does NOT pull in xorg (as in the server). See 'prt-get deptree xorg-libx11', kthx.
Fine libx11 then and all of it's dependents.
Also, prt-get can lock the not installed xorg-libx11 package, I believe. Try prt-get lock xorg-libx11. ... and since prt-get update doesn't install missing dependencies atm, this is really to work around if you care so much about a handfull of X protocol packages :D Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Danny Rawlins [2008-06-26 03:47]:
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Danny Rawlins [2008-06-25 12:30]:
CRUX wrote:
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#235 - prt-get depinst pinentry fiails to build, missing X11 User who did this - Simon Gloßner (Viper)
---------- Ok, I'll add this dependency. Totally forgotten this bug report. :-) ----------
My gawd so this means that if i wanna use prt-get depinst ketchup on my SERVER it'll pull in xorg for a SERVER not bright at all, and not happy. Yet another stupid decision. I'll maintain my own copy.
libx11 does NOT pull in xorg (as in the server). See 'prt-get deptree xorg-libx11', kthx.
Fine libx11 then and all of it's dependents.
Also, prt-get can lock the not installed xorg-libx11 package, I believe. Try prt-get lock xorg-libx11.
... and since prt-get update doesn't install missing dependencies atm, this is really to work around if you care so much about a handfull of X protocol packages :D
Regards, Tilman
I do that now but I wanted a more solid solution. this should of been done long ago. So do as everyone pleases if I don't like it I will alter stuff myself. Then everyone is happy. Regards, Danny Rawlins
participants (5)
-
Danny Rawlins -
Danny Rawlins -
Lucas Hazel -
Simon Gloßner -
Tilman Sauerbeck