Weird bug in recent installers
Hello all, While not official, I've been finding that the crux.ninja ISOs seem to have an issue in the installer where if I select core, opt and xorg together, the installer tries to progress, but it throws up "Abort install?" and the only answer it lets me choose is yes, selecting no just leaves the message on the screen. My workaround has been to only select core and opt together, which seems to work fine. Then I go back and "upgrade" the install. anyone else seeing this?
On 8/15/2024 09:25, Steve Volumetric wrote:
Hello all,
While not official, I've been finding that the crux.ninja ISOs seem to have an issue in the installer where if I select core, opt and xorg together, the installer tries to progress, but it throws up "Abort install?" and the only answer it lets me choose is yes, selecting no just leaves the message on the screen.
My workaround has been to only select core and opt together, which seems to work fine. Then I go back and "upgrade" the install.
anyone else seeing this?
Hello, I'm currently not able to duplicate this. I did find a related issue caused by not selecting a boot loader, but selecting all collections at once works fine here. I just tested with the latest ISO from 2024-08-10 with md5sum ad5fcf58da52dec16c2c98a82ff6b29f and wasn't able to reproduce the problem. Are you using an older ISO or is this happening with multiple versions of it? Regards, Matt
Ahh... good point. I'm not selecting bootloaders because I'm efi-stub booting. I never used to have this issue with 3.7 or 3.6.1, I wondered if something changed in 'setup' recently or something. On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 11:32 AM Matt Housh <jaeger@crux.ninja> wrote:
On 8/15/2024 09:25, Steve Volumetric wrote:
Hello all,
While not official, I've been finding that the crux.ninja ISOs seem to have an issue in the installer where if I select core, opt and xorg together, the installer tries to progress, but it throws up "Abort install?" and the only answer it lets me choose is yes, selecting no just leaves the message on the screen.
My workaround has been to only select core and opt together, which seems to work fine. Then I go back and "upgrade" the install.
anyone else seeing this?
Hello,
I'm currently not able to duplicate this. I did find a related issue caused by not selecting a boot loader, but selecting all collections at once works fine here.
I just tested with the latest ISO from 2024-08-10 with md5sum ad5fcf58da52dec16c2c98a82ff6b29f and wasn't able to reproduce the problem. Are you using an older ISO or is this happening with multiple versions of it?
Regards, Matt
_______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list -- crux@lists.crux.nu To unsubscribe send an email to crux-leave@lists.crux.nu
Hello, btw Steve Volumetric wrote in <CABr5XP3GdSXdcGLX=WaPkXv-YD5WDuzrL6hNti+Xwe9vv82diA@mail.gmail.com>: said Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: crux.nu; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=lists.crux.nu Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=NhFzNPwB Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: crux.nu; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com which surely is wrongly configured as i cannot imagine gmail DKIM signature to be wrong, and furthermore lists.crux goes to wherever and does whatever ie smtp.mailfrom=lists.crux.nu with SPF fail. Btw DMARC and SPF are [peep]. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240815182320.6geTZjjV@steffen%sdaoden.eu>: ... Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sdaoden.eu header.i=@sdaoden.eu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=citron head er.b=iI/0fcqT; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=sdaoden.eu header.i=@sdaoden.eu header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=orange header.b=aoLn0MMT No. You are wrong. Authentication-Results: crux.nu; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=sdaoden.eu (Ditto, but SPF i only keep because some people put value in it, to say the least.) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
I... I have absolutely no idea what any of this means. something security related failed.. which is like.. definitely not something that's new to me, especially coming from my phone, which is absolute trash. If what you're saying is indicative that there's something majorly wrong with my phone, that'd be cool to know. On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 1:37 PM Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> wrote:
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240815182320.6geTZjjV@steffen%sdaoden.eu>: ...
Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sdaoden.eu header.i=@sdaoden.eu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=citron head er.b=iI/0fcqT; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=sdaoden.eu header.i=@sdaoden.eu header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=orange header.b=aoLn0MMT
No. You are wrong.
Authentication-Results: crux.nu; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=sdaoden.eu
(Ditto, but SPF i only keep because some people put value in it, to say the least.)
--steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list -- crux@lists.crux.nu To unsubscribe send an email to crux-leave@lists.crux.nu
Steve Volumetric wrote in <CABr5XP0NPSJvfAdwj8P_P8rH9yRitbE8SJGh8F0GkWoFALJkog@mail.gmail.com>: |On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 1:37 PM Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> \ |wrote: |> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in |> <20240815182320.6geTZjjV@steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |> ... |> |> Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dkim=fail reason="signature |> verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sdaoden.eu |> header.i=@sdaoden.eu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=citron head |> er.b=iI/0fcqT; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" |> header.d=sdaoden.eu header.i=@sdaoden.eu header.a=ed25519-sha256 |> header.s=orange header.b=aoLn0MMT |> |> No. You are wrong. |> |> Authentication-Results: crux.nu; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=sdaoden.eu |> |> (Ditto, but SPF i only keep because some people put value in it, |> to say the least.) |I... I have absolutely no idea what any of this means. | |something security related failed.. which is like.. definitely not |something that's new to me, especially coming from my phone, which is |absolute trash. | |If what you're saying is indicative that there's something majorly wrong |with my phone, that'd be cool to know. No, i think the CRUX mail server setup is broken. Sorry for being not descriptive. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
Ahh, thank you. Happy mail server fixing, I suppose :) On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 3:24 PM Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> wrote:
Steve Volumetric wrote in <CABr5XP0NPSJvfAdwj8P_P8rH9yRitbE8SJGh8F0GkWoFALJkog@mail.gmail.com>: |On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 1:37 PM Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> \ |wrote: |> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in |> <20240815182320.6geTZjjV@steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |> ... |> |> Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dkim=fail reason="signature |> verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sdaoden.eu |> header.i=@sdaoden.eu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=citron head |> er.b=iI/0fcqT; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" |> header.d=sdaoden.eu header.i=@sdaoden.eu header.a=ed25519-sha256 |> header.s=orange header.b=aoLn0MMT |> |> No. You are wrong. |> |> Authentication-Results: crux.nu; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom= sdaoden.eu |> |> (Ditto, but SPF i only keep because some people put value in it, |> to say the least.)
|I... I have absolutely no idea what any of this means. | |something security related failed.. which is like.. definitely not |something that's new to me, especially coming from my phone, which is |absolute trash. | |If what you're saying is indicative that there's something majorly wrong |with my phone, that'd be cool to know.
No, i think the CRUX mail server setup is broken. Sorry for being not descriptive.
--steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
participants (3)
-
Matt Housh -
Steffen Nurpmeso -
Steve Volumetric