Re: repos providing only md5 sums
Hello, I forked exactly that repo and _really_ pulled everything from upstream. Chneukirchen hasnt. There is also a commit fixing a fixed path problem I wanted to have implemented mor elegantly. Regards, Thomas -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: rain1@openmailbox.org Datum: 31.03.2016 17:35 (GMT+01:00) An: John Vogel <jvogel4@stny.rr.com> Cc: crux@lists.crux.nu Betreff: Re: repos providing only md5 sums On 2016-03-31 13:46, John Vogel wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:30:23 -0400 Ryan Mullen <rmmullen@gmail.com> wrote:
A few questions:
1. Signify currently produces a build warning about an implicit declaration of function 'getentropy.' Am I missing something? Surely the crux fork is not the only portable fork of signify - what are we doing in ours that's special and requires a custom fork?
https://github.com/chneukirchen/signify
I haven't tested it yet, but I've had good luck with his cwm port in the past.
Cheers, John _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu https://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux
There are a lot of ports of signify to linux (also a reimplementation in Go and a 'mini' version): * https://github.com/aperezdc/signify * https://github.com/vstakhov/asignify * https://github.com/ebfe/signify * https://github.com/chneukirchen/signify * https://github.com/Blitznote/signify * https://github.com/nurse/signify * https://github.com/vstakhov/asignify * https://github.com/stoeckmann/signify-windows * https://www.fefe.de/signify/ * https://jedisct1.github.io/minisign/ Distros seem to have (unofficial) packages that point to aperezdc's version: * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/signify/ * https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/signify-openbsd * https://gpo.zugaina.org/app-crypt/signify The version by chneukirchen looks good - especially because it was pulling in all the new changes from upstream, aperezdc did not seem to do that? - although he just recently marked it as unmaintained and is now: * https://github.com/chneukirchen/outils The situation is still not ideal but using outils seems like a fine idea for now. _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu https://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux
participants (1)
-
Thomas Penteker