Just to clarify and to help put this to rest once and for all. systemd: 1) mixes udev and an init into a single entity. 2) redesigns the entire init process unnecessarily and is not backwards compatible with any older init systems. 3) If anything catastrophic in systemd breaks - you're boned. The _only_ init alternative that should _ever_ be considered for CRUX is either: runit, or something similar. cheers James James Mills / prologic E: prologic@shortcircuit.net.au W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Baptiste <bedis9@gmail.com> wrote:
Very simply: systemd is an abomination of everything thar CRUX is.
This is the reason why I love and use Crux :)
Baptiste
systemd:
1) mixes udev and an init into a single entity. 2) redesigns the entire init process unnecessarily and is not backwards compatible with any older init systems. 3) If anything catastrophic in systemd breaks - you're boned.
The _only_ init alternative that should _ever_ be considered for CRUX is either: runit, or something similar.
See also perp, "a persistent process supervisor", for a good service management framework completely independent of any init/process 1: http://b0llix.net/perp/
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Baptiste <bedis9@gmail.com> wrote:
Very simply: systemd is an abomination of everything thar CRUX is.
Amen brother. Vitaly
participants (2)
-
James Mills -
vitaly＠copperisle.com