rrdtool package build broken
Hi there! I just realized that contrib/rrdtool's package installs some files directly to /usr/lib/perl despite of a make prefix=$PKG/usr install: /usr/lib/perl /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/RRDp.pm /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/auto /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/auto/RRDp /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/auto/RRDp/.packlist /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/auto/RRDs /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/auto/RRDs/RRDs.bs /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/auto/RRDs/RRDs.so /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/auto/RRDs/.packlist /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/RRDs.pm /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/ntmake.pl /usr/lib/perl/5.8.8/linux/perllocal.pod which should 1. not go outside of the package $PKG/usr if make prefix= is used. 2. go into /usr/lib/perl5 instead. So, we have another candidate for http://crux.nu/Main/FakerootPorts I couldn't find a configure option (or it's undocumented) which allows to configure a target for the perl modules. I've put Tobias Oetiker, the author of rrdtool on CC. Well, what do you suggest to do? Best greets, -- Clemens Koller _______________________________ R&D Imaging Devices Anagramm GmbH Rupert-Mayer-Str. 45/1 81379 Muenchen Germany http://www.anagramm-technology.com Phone: +49-89-741518-50 Fax: +49-89-741518-19
Hello, again!
I just realized that contrib/rrdtool's package installs some files directly to /usr/lib/perl despite of a make prefix=$PKG/usr install:
Well, and the next question is: Is there already an effective way to determine which files in the system are _not_ in the package db besides find/sort/grep? Thanks, Clemens Koller _______________________________ R&D Imaging Devices Anagramm GmbH Rupert-Mayer-Str. 45/1 81379 Muenchen Germany http://www.anagramm-technology.com Phone: +49-89-741518-50 Fax: +49-89-741518-19
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 09:45:09PM +0200, Clemens Koller wrote:
Hello, again!
I just realized that contrib/rrdtool's package installs some files directly to /usr/lib/perl despite of a make prefix=$PKG/usr install:
Well, and the next question is: Is there already an effective way to determine which files in the system are _not_ in the package db besides find/sort/grep?
1. prtorphan, but you would need specify -d (iirc) option for every directory you're interested in. prt-get install prt-utils 2. patch to pkgutils (pkginfo) which adding -O and -m options. -O doing what you want, and -m doing the reverse: it finds absent files. http://marc.info/?l=crux&m=112535012726535&w=2 3. Last resort is switch to pkgutils-c, which accumulated all my patches.
Thanks,
Clemens Koller
Good day, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@mail.ru backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
Hi, Anton! Anton Vorontsov schrieb:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 09:45:09PM +0200, Clemens Koller wrote:
Well, and the next question is: Is there already an effective way to determine which files in the system are _not_ in the package db besides find/sort/grep?
1. prtorphan, but you would need specify -d (iirc) option for every directory you're interested in. prt-get install prt-utils
2. patch to pkgutils (pkginfo) which adding -O and -m options. -O doing what you want, and -m doing the reverse: it finds absent files. http://marc.info/?l=crux&m=112535012726535&w=2
3. Last resort is switch to pkgutils-c, which accumulated all my patches.
Great! Thanks! CRUX just rocks! I hope to be able to present soon my fully CRUXed(tm) self made SubNotebook Thingy (based on an embedded PowerPC): [Advertising On] http://anagramm-technology.com/99_Images/technology/FoxWithHand.jpg [Advertising Off] Is there an official "Powered by CRUX" Logo? Greets, Clemens Koller _______________________________ R&D Imaging Devices Anagramm GmbH Rupert-Mayer-Str. 45/1 81379 Muenchen Germany http://www.anagramm-technology.com Phone: +49-89-741518-50 Fax: +49-89-741518-19
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:09:50PM +0200, Clemens Koller wrote: > Hi, Anton! > > Anton Vorontsov schrieb: > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 09:45:09PM +0200, Clemens Koller wrote: > >> Well, and the next question is: Is there already an effective way > >> to determine which files in the system are _not_ in the package db > >> besides find/sort/grep? > > 1. prtorphan, but you would need specify -d (iirc) option for every > > directory you're interested in. > > prt-get install prt-utils > > 2. patch to pkgutils (pkginfo) which adding -O and -m options. -O doing > > what you want, and -m doing the reverse: it finds absent files. > > http://marc.info/?l=crux&m=112535012726535&w=2 > > 3. Last resort is switch to pkgutils-c, which accumulated all my > > patches. > > Great! Thanks! CRUX just rocks! > > I hope to be able to present soon my fully CRUXed(tm) self made > SubNotebook Thingy (based on an embedded PowerPC): > [Advertising On] > http://anagramm-technology.com/99_Images/technology/FoxWithHand.jpg > [Advertising Off] Hehe, hello comrade! Take a look at http://crux-arm.kmeaw.com/ Not powerpc, though.. but embedded anyway. CRUX already running HP iPaqs hx4700 and h5550. ;-) -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@mail.ru backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
On Sat, 19 May 2007 21:45:09 +0200 Clemens Koller <clemens.koller@anagramm.de> wrote:
Well, and the next question is: Is there already an effective way to determine which files in the system are _not_ in the package db besides find/sort/grep?
I thought this was what "prtorphan" was for? //treach
participants (3)
-
Anton Vorontsov -
Clemens Koller -
treach