[Clc-contrib] amule dup from aon and jolupa

James Mills prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
Sun Aug 21 07:02:56 UTC 2005

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:58:24AM +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:47:43 +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 00:10:42 +0300, Antti Nyk?nen wrote:
> > [...]
> > > But, IMHO, amule is a better name for the port because every release
> > > from them seems to fix critical bugs, so the latest version is the one
> > > you should be using, no matter if it's a release candidate or not.
> > I agree. jolupa, any comment on that?
> Jolupa, I'd like to ask you a third time to actually comment on this
> subject...  as you know, we're expecting you to actively follow this
> list, and to listen to suggestions from other maintainers.

Just an opinion from a 4th party, I'm in agreement with the both of you,
I don't beleieve any versioning should be part of the actual port's
name. This is what the 'version' variable is for :)


-"Problems are Solved by Method"

More information about the crux-contrib mailing list