[crux-contrib] Header section in Pkgfiles

Victor Martinez pitillo at ono.com
Sun Jun 27 18:43:53 UTC 2010


On 06/27/10 19:21, Bartlomiej Palmowski wrote:
> So, all Nice to have comments should be dropped too (or officially accepted).
>
>    
Hello,
the use of the "nice to have" comment was discussed some time ago, and 
there weren't any objections
(and neither a homogeneous line to call it: nice to have or optional) 
and from my point of view, it gives
more info, from the maintainer to the users, about what can be 
interesting to one port to link with.
The 2 lines added I think doesn't provide any info which can not be 
provided in others, like we were
talking in the channel, one of them is a dependency and the other a big 
description.

> 2010/6/27 Juergen Daubert<jue at jue.li>:
>    
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 03:47:32PM +0200, pitillo at ono.com wrote:
>>      
>>>     Hello,
>> Hi,
>>      
>>>     I want to comment about the section "# Comments" :added in two Pkgfiles
>>>     (menu-cache and libfm).
>>>     I think we must keep the contrib collection (which is a good collection
>>>     without being an official one and it's well maintained and IMHO
>>>     maintainers do a good job) homogeneous with the official collections.
>>>        
>> I agree. We should only use the predefined headers or talk about the
>> addition of a new one before using it.
>>
>>      
This is the point of this thread. I think at least things must (or 
could) be talked, at least to see other's opinion or points of view. 
There is nothing hidden in my post, but keeping things homogeneous, is a 
important point to be discussed.
>> Greetings
>> Juergen
>>      
>
Regards, Victor.

-- 
Learning bit by bit.
Victor Martinez | http://lokalix.dyndns.org




More information about the crux-contrib mailing list