[clc-devel] [port update] gqview
sip at varlock.com
Wed Jun 16 13:29:12 UTC 2004
On 06/13/04 09:43 Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> I closed all three bug reports which are missing a URL to an httpup
> repo. Unfortunately, they don't contain a contact information either; if
> this kind of "port update" spam continues to be submitted, we might
> reconsider the submission policy.
there's a bunch of new tickets (87..92) with no contact information,
no httpup repo for unmaintained, wrong type, etc.
Btw, what to do with contrib summissions / request for
updates? The submission rules explain that it's better
to contact the maintainer directly. Shall we make
this rule more strict?
Apart from that, I think a redefinition of ticket types
would make the submission process a bit more clear:
- Defect/update in contrib port (if we want this)
- Defect/update in unmaintained port
Just an idea,
Simone Rota WEB : http://www.varlock.com
Bergamo, Italy MAIL: sip at varlock.com
More information about the crux-devel