[clc-devel] missing packages.

Tilman Sauerbeck tilman at code-monkey.de
Sun May 23 19:47:11 UTC 2004

Robert McMeekin <rrm3 at rrm3.org> [2004-05-21 19:00]:
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:14, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> I think you mean 'CONTRIB-2_0', no?  But that brings up an interesting
> point.  This is a huge upgrade, and there are likely those who don't
> want to use the new 2.6 kernel for a bit longer, until it gets a bit
> more mature.  I won't be using 1.3 anymore though, so I won't be able to
> test my ports there.

Same here :\

> Would it be worthwhile to send a mail to crux@ asking for people to test
> newer ports and if they work, let us know so we can tag them
> CONTRIB-1_3?  Maybe we should just leave it like what normally happens,
> but this is the biggest release I've seen since I started using CRUX at
> 0.9.4.

I don't like the idea of tagging ports without having verified that the
changes are actually okay.

After all, this is contrib/, which usually means that only tested ports
go in etc...


More information about the crux-devel mailing list