[clc-devel] ports in contrib depending on ports in unmaintained
sip at varlock.com
Fri Oct 8 16:04:22 UTC 2004
On 10/08/04 09:05 Jukka Heino wrote:
> So in my opinion maintained ports shouldn't depend on unmaintained or
> non-existant ports. The current situation is of course understandable,
> since most of the GNOME stuff isn't maintained anymore. But in general I
> propose we move towards a uniformly maintained contrib with no
> dependencies on other collections than base, opt and contrib itself.
I'm trying to clean up a bit my ports
( see this ticket http://clc.morpheus.net:6999/clc/tktview?tn=12,4 )
Since we're on topic, a couple of comments:
- I'm tagging unmaintained most of rox-related addons. I've
also updated them to latest version. I'm not using them anymore
so new maintainers are welcome.
- I maintain pygtk, _without_ libglade. Feel free to take maintainership
and add libglade support if needed.
- As Johannes wrote in this thread, unmaintained ports will be nuked
one day or another, everybody is invited to keep an eye on which
ports you'd like to save.
Simone Rota WEB : http://www.varlock.com
Bergamo, Italy MAIL: sip at varlock.com
More information about the crux-devel