[clc-devel] unmaintained; next try

Johannes Winkelmann jw at tks6.net
Fri Sep 10 11:10:32 UTC 2004


On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 13:04:37 +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> Note that this would mean that we wouldn't have GNOME in our tree
> anymore, since rrm3 isn't around. IMO this would be the right
> consequence when a maintainer leaves, and we shouldn't try to keep the
> ports around but to find a new maintainer for them.
Clarification: The wording was a bit unfortunate; what I mean is:
We should try to keep the ports around without having someone looking
after them. If they are important, we should either find someone to look
after them or do it ourselfs (become the maintainer for them);
otherwise, we should drop them. 

> Best regards, Johannes
Johannes Winkelmann              mailto:jw at tks6.net
Bern, Switzerland                http://jw.tks6.net

More information about the crux-devel mailing list