[clc-devel] unmaintained; next try

Johannes Winkelmann jw at tks6.net
Fri Sep 10 11:16:23 UTC 2004

Oh well,

On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 13:10:32 +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> Hi,
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 13:04:37 +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> [...]
> > Note that this would mean that we wouldn't have GNOME in our tree
> > anymore, since rrm3 isn't around. IMO this would be the right
> > consequence when a maintainer leaves, and we shouldn't try to keep the
> > ports around but to find a new maintainer for them.
> Clarification: The wording was a bit unfortunate; what I mean is:
> We should try to keep the ports around without having someone looking
> after them. 
"We shouldn't..."

I'll double check my next correction mail, promised ;-)

Johannes Winkelmann              mailto:jw at tks6.net
Bern, Switzerland                http://jw.tks6.net

More information about the crux-devel mailing list