[crux-devel] meeting notes & next IRC Meeting
jdolan at jdolan.dyndns.org
Mon May 29 13:48:26 UTC 2006
Mark Rosenstand wrote:
>> - Extend setup to handle modular X; one idea which was discussed and
>> considered viable was to do grouping, such that one could first select
>> the core group, the xorg group, and the [name to be found; remaining
>> packages from opt] group
> I'll suggest something like the FreeBSD install set selections, except
> for the top-level profiles ("Developer desktop" etc.), so instead of
> having all packages in one list, there'd be something like:
> [x] core -->
> [ ] opt -->
> [ ] xorg -->
> Space would select/deselect all the packages, Enter would go into a list
> similar to the one we have today, listing all the packages in the
>> - The idea of dependency handling during 'setup' was brought up, but
>> not discussed in detail yet [personal remark: easier with
>> dependencies in packages]
> Sounds more like 3.0 material IMHO :)
The CRUX Evolution project had a setup like this. They offered groups
like X11, Gnome, KDE, Printer support, etc. It was very slick.. altho
I'm sure they were using hard-coded or ad-hoc lists to calculate and
A: Because it's difficult to read.
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
A: Top posting.
Q: What's the most annoying thing about usenet?
More information about the crux-devel