From aon at iki.fi Sat May 9 21:12:03 2009 From: aon at iki.fi (Antti Nykanen) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 00:12:03 +0300 Subject: [crux-devel] [PATCH] Do not attempt to build a package if the resulting file can't be written. Message-ID: <1241903523-9725-1-git-send-email-aon@iki.fi> --- pkgmk.in | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/pkgmk.in b/pkgmk.in index 9fdf768..de50c95 100755 --- a/pkgmk.in +++ b/pkgmk.in @@ -350,6 +350,11 @@ remove_work_dir() { build_package() { local BUILD_SUCCESSFUL="no" + + if [ ! -w "$TARGET" ]; then + error "'$TARGET' is not writable." + exit 1 + fi make_work_dir -- 1.6.2.4 From tilman at crux.nu Sun May 10 10:35:05 2009 From: tilman at crux.nu (Tilman Sauerbeck) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:35:05 +0200 Subject: [crux-devel] Ship core fonts on the 2.6 iso? Message-ID: <20090510103505.GA10445@code-monkey.de> Hi, Juergen and me have begun some preparations for the 2.6 release (there's a todo list in the wiki at http://crux.nu/Wiki/TODO26). For our xorg ports, I've removed a couple of ancient modules that aren't in use anymore. I'm also considering shipping xorg without any core font packages (ie, drop the following packages from the iso: xorg-font-adobe-100dpi xorg-font-adobe-75dpi xorg-font-alias xorg-font-bh-100dpi xorg-font-bh-75dpi xorg-font-bitstream-100dpi xorg-font-bitstream-75dpi xorg-font-bitstream-vera xorg-font-cursor-misc xorg-font-misc-misc A 'fixed' font and cursor fonts are built into libXfont these days, so -cursor-misc and -misc-misc can safely be removed. IMO shipping bitstream-vera suffices for the iso -- if users wish to use core fonts like -bitstream-100dpi they can install those from ports. Objections? Thanks, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From clemens.ml at gmx.net Sun May 10 23:04:38 2009 From: clemens.ml at gmx.net (Clemens Koller) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 01:04:38 +0200 Subject: [crux-devel] Ship core fonts on the 2.6 iso? In-Reply-To: <20090510103505.GA10445@code-monkey.de> References: <20090510103505.GA10445@code-monkey.de> Message-ID: <4A075D86.2060108@gmx.net> Hi There! Tilman Sauerbeck schrieb: > Hi, > Juergen and me have begun some preparations for the 2.6 release > (there's a todo list in the wiki at http://crux.nu/Wiki/TODO26). > > For our xorg ports, I've removed a couple of ancient modules that aren't > in use anymore. I'm also considering shipping xorg without any core font > packages (ie, drop the following packages from the iso: > > xorg-font-adobe-100dpi > xorg-font-adobe-75dpi > xorg-font-alias > xorg-font-bh-100dpi > xorg-font-bh-75dpi > xorg-font-bitstream-100dpi > xorg-font-bitstream-75dpi > xorg-font-bitstream-vera > xorg-font-cursor-misc > xorg-font-misc-misc > > A 'fixed' font and cursor fonts are built into libXfont these days, so > -cursor-misc and -misc-misc can safely be removed. IMO shipping > bitstream-vera suffices for the iso -- if users wish to use core fonts > like -bitstream-100dpi they can install those from ports. > > Objections? In my opinion: Remove them and go with a - out of the box - working xorg configuration. Regards, Clemens From tilman at crux.nu Mon May 11 17:22:28 2009 From: tilman at crux.nu (Tilman Sauerbeck) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 19:22:28 +0200 Subject: [crux-devel] Ship core fonts on the 2.6 iso? In-Reply-To: <4A075D86.2060108@gmx.net> References: <20090510103505.GA10445@code-monkey.de> <4A075D86.2060108@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20090511172228.GB1197@code-monkey.de> Clemens Koller [2009-05-11 01:04]: > Tilman Sauerbeck schrieb: >> Hi, >> Juergen and me have begun some preparations for the 2.6 release >> (there's a todo list in the wiki at http://crux.nu/Wiki/TODO26). >> >> For our xorg ports, I've removed a couple of ancient modules that aren't >> in use anymore. I'm also considering shipping xorg without any core font >> packages (ie, drop the following packages from the iso: >> >> xorg-font-adobe-100dpi xorg-font-adobe-75dpi xorg-font-alias >> xorg-font-bh-100dpi xorg-font-bh-75dpi xorg-font-bitstream-100dpi >> xorg-font-bitstream-75dpi xorg-font-bitstream-vera >> xorg-font-cursor-misc xorg-font-misc-misc >> >> A 'fixed' font and cursor fonts are built into libXfont these days, so >> -cursor-misc and -misc-misc can safely be removed. IMO shipping >> bitstream-vera suffices for the iso -- if users wish to use core fonts >> like -bitstream-100dpi they can install those from ports. >> >> Objections? > > In my opinion: > Remove them and go with a - out of the box - working xorg configuration. I believe we don't need to ship any xorg configuration -- X works just fine these days if you start the X server without any xorg.conf. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jaeger at morpheus.net Sun May 24 18:07:23 2009 From: jaeger at morpheus.net (Matt Housh) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:07:23 -0500 Subject: [crux-devel] Changes for system/iso.git 2.5 Message-ID: <4A198CDB.8020608@morpheus.net> Tilman asked me to post a diff of my changes, so here it is. These are the changes I made to get the updated ISO working with 2.6.29.3, new busybox, etc. Matt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2.5-iso-updates.diff.gz Type: application/gzip Size: 7071 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fredrik at obra.se Sun May 24 21:15:47 2009 From: fredrik at obra.se (Fredrik Rinnestam) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:15:47 +0200 Subject: [crux-devel] Changes for system/iso.git 2.5 In-Reply-To: <4A198CDB.8020608@morpheus.net> References: <4A198CDB.8020608@morpheus.net> Message-ID: <20090524211547.GA2558@zoidberg.obra.se> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:07:23PM -0500, Matt Housh wrote: > Tilman asked me to post a diff of my changes, so here it is. These are > the changes I made to get the updated ISO working with 2.6.29.3, new > busybox, etc. > > Matt Looks great. love the $CUSTOMVERSION string :). I would suggest replacing the kernel "/arch/i386/ stuff with "/arch/x86/" which works with both i686 and x86_64. -- /Fredrik Rinnestam From jue at jue.li Mon May 25 09:29:37 2009 From: jue at jue.li (Juergen Daubert) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:29:37 +0200 Subject: [crux-devel] Changes for system/iso.git 2.5 In-Reply-To: <4A198CDB.8020608@morpheus.net> References: <4A198CDB.8020608@morpheus.net> Message-ID: <20090525092937.GA11575@jue.netz> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:07:23PM -0500, Matt Housh wrote: > Tilman asked me to post a diff of my changes, so here it is. These are > the changes I made to get the updated ISO working with 2.6.29.3, new > busybox, etc. Is this a diff against the 2.5 branch? Just wondering about the changes to packages.xorg, which we have in 2.6 already. Apart from that, it looks fine for me, many thanks Matt. Please push, together with the kernel config, to our 2.6 branch. Greetings Juergen -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue at jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux