From jue at jue.li  Tue Feb  2 08:40:23 2010
From: jue at jue.li (Juergen Daubert)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:40:23 +0100
Subject: [crux-devel] Resignation
In-Reply-To: <4B649A97.6030107@iki.fi>
References: <4B649A97.6030107@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20100202084023.GA17680@jue.netz>

Hello Antti,

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:46:15PM +0200, Antti Nyk?nen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Due to changed priorities and interests I've decided to step down as
> a CRUX maintainer. I have (hopefully) fixed the open bugs that were
> assigned to me in Flyspray and brought at least some of my ports up
> to date.

It's sad to see you go, thanks a lot for all the work you did for 
CRUX during the past years.


All the best and kind regards
Juergen

-- 
Juergen Daubert  |  mailto:jue at jue.li  
Korb, Germany    |  http://jue.li/crux



From sepen at mikeux.dyndns.org  Tue Feb  2 16:20:28 2010
From: sepen at mikeux.dyndns.org (Jose V Beneyto)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:20:28 +0100
Subject: [crux-devel] Resignation
In-Reply-To: <4B649A97.6030107@iki.fi>
References: <4B649A97.6030107@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <4B6850CC.2030902@mikeux.dyndns.org>

Hello Antti,

Antti Nyk?nen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Due to changed priorities and interests I've decided to step down as a 
> CRUX maintainer. I have (hopefully) fixed the open bugs that were 
> assigned to me in Flyspray and brought at least some of my ports up to 
> date. 
Thanks a lot for the work.
I hope one day we see you back

Hasta luego,

-- 
Jose V Beneyto | http://mikeux.dyndns.org


-- 
Jose V Beneyto | http://mikeux.dyndns.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.crux.nu/pipermail/crux-devel/attachments/20100202/b03a3e2c/attachment.html>

From jue at jue.li  Wed Feb 24 10:28:56 2010
From: jue at jue.li (Juergen Daubert)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:28:56 +0100
Subject: [crux-devel] nfs-utils, new dependency libcap
Message-ID: <20100224102856.GA3457@jue.netz>

Hi all,

as of version 1.2.2 core/nfs-utils depends on opt/libcap, I've 
overseen this new dependency and committed the update, sorry for 
that. This issue has been reported [1], the corresponding commit 
to nfs-utils is here [2].

We have at least three options now:
a) downgrade nfs-utils to 1.2.1
b) move libcap and libattr from opt to core
c) move nfs-utils from core to opt

I tend towards b) because the new version comes with a lot of
fixes and improvements [3] and most users might have libcap 
installed anyway, it's part of our ISO and cdrkit depends on it.

Opinions?


Thanks and best regards
Juergen

[1] http://crux.nu/bugs/?do=details&task_id=564
[2] http://tinyurl.com/yh4wqlg
[3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfsv4/11304

-- 
Juergen Daubert  |  mailto:jue at jue.li  
Korb, Germany    |  http://jue.li/crux



From acrux_it at libero.it  Wed Feb 24 15:33:13 2010
From: acrux_it at libero.it (acrux)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:33:13 +0100
Subject: [crux-devel] nfs-utils, new dependency libcap
In-Reply-To: <20100224102856.GA3457@jue.netz>
References: <20100224102856.GA3457@jue.netz>
Message-ID: <20100224163313.2fceece6.acrux_it@libero.it>

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:28:56 +0100
Juergen Daubert <jue at jue.li> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> as of version 1.2.2 core/nfs-utils depends on opt/libcap, I've 
> overseen this new dependency and committed the update, sorry for 
> that. This issue has been reported [1], the corresponding commit 
> to nfs-utils is here [2].
> 
> We have at least three options now:
> a) downgrade nfs-utils to 1.2.1
> b) move libcap and libattr from opt to core
> c) move nfs-utils from core to opt
> 
> I tend towards b) because the new version comes with a lot of
> fixes and improvements [3] and most users might have libcap 
> installed anyway, it's part of our ISO and cdrkit depends on it.
> 
> Opinions?
> 


in my humble opinion, i'm for option (c). It's the simplest way to solve this problem.
nfs-utils are usefull only in particular scenarios anyway it must remain available into installation ISO.

thanks for your hard work,
--nico
-- 
acrux <acrux_it at libero.it>


From tek at serverop.de  Wed Feb 24 16:40:32 2010
From: tek at serverop.de (Thomas Penteker)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:40:32 +0100
Subject: [crux-devel] nfs-utils, new dependency libcap
In-Reply-To: <20100224163313.2fceece6.acrux_it@libero.it>
References: <20100224102856.GA3457@jue.netz>
	<20100224163313.2fceece6.acrux_it@libero.it>
Message-ID: <20100224164032.GA3412@serverop.de>

* acrux (acrux_it at libero.it) wrote:
> > Opinions?
 
> in my humble opinion, i'm for option (c). It's the simplest way to solve this problem.
> nfs-utils are usefull only in particular scenarios anyway it must remain available into installation ISO.

+1

regards, Thomas Penteker

-- 
Program load too heavy for processor to lift.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.crux.nu/pipermail/crux-devel/attachments/20100224/cbc6f288/attachment.asc>

From jaeger at morpheus.net  Thu Feb 25 03:57:28 2010
From: jaeger at morpheus.net (Matt Housh)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:57:28 -0600
Subject: [crux-devel] nfs-utils, new dependency libcap
In-Reply-To: <20100224102856.GA3457@jue.netz>
References: <20100224102856.GA3457@jue.netz>
Message-ID: <4B85F528.9010908@morpheus.net>

On 2/24/2010 04:28, Juergen Daubert wrote:
[...]
> We have at least three options now:
> a) downgrade nfs-utils to 1.2.1
> b) move libcap and libattr from opt to core
> c) move nfs-utils from core to opt

For what it's worth, I like option c as well.

Matt


From jue at jue.li  Fri Feb 26 17:21:46 2010
From: jue at jue.li (Juergen Daubert)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:21:46 +0100
Subject: [crux-devel] nfs-utils, new dependency libcap
In-Reply-To: <4B85F528.9010908@morpheus.net>
References: <20100224102856.GA3457@jue.netz>
 <4B85F528.9010908@morpheus.net>
Message-ID: <20100226172146.GA9643@jue.netz>

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 09:57:28PM -0600, Matt Housh wrote:
> On 2/24/2010 04:28, Juergen Daubert wrote:
> [...]
> >We have at least three options now:
> >a) downgrade nfs-utils to 1.2.1
> >b) move libcap and libattr from opt to core
> >c) move nfs-utils from core to opt
> 
> For what it's worth, I like option c as well.
> 

Thanks for all responses, looks like c) is the way to go, which is 
ok for me as well. 
If we take NFSv4-support into consideration moving to opt is 
certainly the best way, because that will add further dependencies. 


Greetings
Juergen

-- 
Juergen Daubert  |  mailto:jue at jue.li  
Korb, Germany    |  http://jue.li/crux