GCC 4.1 for 2.2?

Mikhail Kolesnik mike at openbunker.org
Sat Mar 11 12:55:04 UTC 2006


Hello, Mark.

On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:12:17 +0100
Mark Rosenstand <mark at borkware.net> wrote:

> On Saturday 11 March 2006 12:35, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:02:11 +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> > > FWIW, I have succesfully rebuilt (almost) all of my packages with
> > > GCC 4.1. They're from the 2.2 branch, revision 861. All were
> > > up-to-date before building, and the toolchain were first rebuilt
> > > two times, just to be sure.
> > > ...
> > However, from your report (and the ChangeLog for 4.1) updating
> > between releases sounds quite feasible, so if we manage to get out
> > 2.2 soon, I'd prefer to keep 4.0.x, and update to 4.1.1 or 4.1.2
> > through ports once they're available.
> 
> That sounds perfect!

Except one thing: any "cruxer's complete guide on the rigth way
of rebuilding toolchain" ?
Any sort of double-compilation sounds heretic ))
Yes, I think this is very important.
Am I paranoid?

-- 
Mikhail Kolesnik
ICQ: #260259143
IRC: freenode/mike_k, rusnet/mike_k
NIC handle: MKK83-UANIC



More information about the CRUX mailing list