default Reply-To in mailinglist headers.

Robert Bauck Hamar roberth at ifi.uio.no
Mon Nov 6 12:28:40 UTC 2006


*Sander van Dijk:
>Hello,
>
>I just replied to a mail that was sent to crux at lists.crux.nu, realizing 
>too late that I was replying to the original sender, not to the list.

But it would be worse if a mail you expected to be sent only to the 
original sender, ended up in the list?

>Could the Reply-To headerfield of mails received from the mailinglist 
>be set to crux at lists.crux.nu by default (note that this will leave the 
>From field intact)? That would be more convenient.

Please read this: <URL:http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
-- 
Robert Bauck Hamar
It is true that VI-VI-VI is the editor of the beast.
          – Richard M Stallman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.crux.nu/pipermail/crux/attachments/20061106/1b7c70d7/attachment.asc>


More information about the CRUX mailing list