Back to CRUX

Mark Rosenstand mark at
Thu Oct 5 18:41:46 UTC 2006

On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 13:04 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> Another thing which I (still) dislike a little bit are the
> inconsistent naming conventions of the few utilities managing
> the ports and packages. There is ports, prt-* and pkg*.
> The naming convention of prt-* utilities seems to be grown
> evolutionary as counterpart to apt-* of debian?

I agree that some of the utilities in prt-utils are less useful than
others (e.g. prtcreate), and it'd be nice to see it trimmed down a bit.

> The pkg* naming convention seems to have its roots in slackware
> and *BSD? The ports utility seem to have its roots in CRUX
> itself...

SunOS uses pkgadd, pkgrm, ... as their package management tools. They're
much more bloated than Per's pkgutils, though.

More information about the CRUX mailing list