To keep or not to keep tarballs

Lucas Hazel lucas at die.net.au
Tue Jul 21 22:50:39 UTC 2009


On Wednesday 22 July 2009 07:19:49 Mikhail Kolesnik wrote:
> Hello, Hazel.
>
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:33:52 +0100
>
> Hazel Russman <hazel_russman at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > In Gentoo, one normally keeps source tarballs because they are frequently
> > re-used, either for patch updates or for rebuilding packages against
> > upgraded libraries. Is this also the case in Crux? And do the compiled
> > .pkg.tar.gz files need to be kept after the package has been installed?
>
> You can easily adjust a few lines in pkgmk.conf(5) to put packages
> and/or tarballs to the temporary directory, for example. And there is no
> need to keep packages unless you want to dive into some specific
> version to search for something. The pkg-backup[1][2] might be a very
> handy tool.
>
> [1] http://git.die.net.au/crux/tools/pkg-backup
> [2] http://crux.nu/Wiki/PackageBackups

Keeping packages can also be useful if you want to run a package repository 
for a number of crux machines.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.crux.nu/pipermail/crux/attachments/20090722/4b59edec/attachment.asc>


More information about the CRUX mailing list