[Clc-crux64] CRUX64(-danm) and CLC
daniel at danm.de
Tue Dec 27 17:58:00 UTC 2005
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 03:47, Lucas Hazel wrote:
> Regarding -fPIC, I've come across a few applications that won't compile
> without it. I've heard that not using it results in a slight
> performance increase, but that doesn't bother me. I'd rather my 0.2%
> CPU time to be used doing things correctly rather than quickly.
I've heard/read that too. But however, Matt left it out and told me he hasn't
got any problems so far.
On AMD64, this is a necessity, if shared objects aren't built with support for
position independent code, the build process bails out with an error message
foo.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared
object; recompile with -fPIC
Berlin, Germany OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A
More information about the crux64