From darran.kartaschew at nusystems.com.au Mon Oct 3 00:20:15 2005 From: darran.kartaschew at nusystems.com.au (Darran Kartaschew) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:20:15 +1000 Subject: [Clc-crux64] CRUX x86_64 package confusion Message-ID: <46E4D8735224B042AA4723B77181080B133BF5@mailtemp.nusystems.com.au> Hi Guys, Just like to ask about the "libstdc++-compat" provided on the ISO. The one that I have (that comes with the ISO) appears to be a 32bit package? Is that correct? Over the past week or so, I have been trying to get the ATi drivers working on my system, and while the settings all appear to be correct the driver isn't loading. (even the X log shows it loading and initialising). After a bit of troubleshooting, I've found that the ATi driver required "libstdc++.so.5". Since a 64bit version doesn't exist on the system, the driver won't load... Is it possible to obtain a 64bit build of this library? (and the others included in the libstdc++-compat package)? Darran From darran.kartaschew at nusystems.com.au Mon Oct 3 03:32:39 2005 From: darran.kartaschew at nusystems.com.au (Darran Kartaschew) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:32:39 +1000 Subject: [Clc-crux64] CRUX x86_64 package confusion Message-ID: <46E4D8735224B042AA4723B77181080B133C90@mailtemp.nusystems.com.au> Hi Guys, Just been reading through the archive, and will download the Mandrake RPM to get the file(s) I need... Darran -----Original Message----- From: clc-crux64-admin at berlios.de [mailto:clc-crux64-admin at berlios.de] On Behalf Of Darran Kartaschew Sent: Monday, 3 October 2005 10:20 To: clc-crux64 at lists.berlios.de Subject: [Clc-crux64] CRUX x86_64 package confusion Hi Guys, Just like to ask about the "libstdc++-compat" provided on the ISO. The one that I have (that comes with the ISO) appears to be a 32bit package? Is that correct? Over the past week or so, I have been trying to get the ATi drivers working on my system, and while the settings all appear to be correct the driver isn't loading. (even the X log shows it loading and initialising). After a bit of troubleshooting, I've found that the ATi driver required "libstdc++.so.5". Since a 64bit version doesn't exist on the system, the driver won't load... Is it possible to obtain a 64bit build of this library? (and the others included in the libstdc++-compat package)? Darran _______________________________________________ Clc-crux64 mailing list Clc-crux64 at lists.berlios.de http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/clc-crux64 From lasso at spacecentre.se Mon Oct 3 06:44:44 2005 From: lasso at spacecentre.se (Lars Helmer) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:44:44 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Clc-crux64] CRUX x86_64 package confusion In-Reply-To: <46E4D8735224B042AA4723B77181080B133C90@mailtemp.nusystems.com.au> References: <46E4D8735224B042AA4723B77181080B133C90@mailtemp.nusystems.com.au> Message-ID: <52478.62.95.121.125.1128321884.squirrel@62.95.121.125> hello, the latest libstdc++-compat port in opt64 _is_ based on the madrake 64-bit rpm and the ati_driver port in contrib64 works with this port installed. cheers, lars On Mon, October 3, 2005 5:32 am, Darran Kartaschew said: > Hi Guys, > > Just been reading through the archive, and will download the Mandrake > RPM to get the file(s) I need... > > Darran > > -----Original Message----- > From: clc-crux64-admin at berlios.de [mailto:clc-crux64-admin at berlios.de] > On Behalf Of Darran Kartaschew > Sent: Monday, 3 October 2005 10:20 > To: clc-crux64 at lists.berlios.de > Subject: [Clc-crux64] CRUX x86_64 package confusion > > Hi Guys, > > Just like to ask about the "libstdc++-compat" provided on the ISO. The > one that I have (that comes with the ISO) appears to be a 32bit package? > Is that correct? > > Over the past week or so, I have been trying to get the ATi drivers > working on my system, and while the settings all appear to be correct > the driver isn't loading. (even the X log shows it loading and > initialising). After a bit of troubleshooting, I've found that the ATi > driver required "libstdc++.so.5". Since a 64bit version doesn't exist on > the system, the driver won't load... > > Is it possible to obtain a 64bit build of this library? (and the others > included in the libstdc++-compat package)? > > Darran > > > _______________________________________________ > Clc-crux64 mailing list > Clc-crux64 at lists.berlios.de > http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/clc-crux64 > _______________________________________________ > Clc-crux64 mailing list > Clc-crux64 at lists.berlios.de > http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/clc-crux64 > From lasso at spacecentre.se Wed Oct 26 18:12:03 2005 From: lasso at spacecentre.se (Lars Helmer) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:12:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Clc-crux64] libglut woes Message-ID: <7341.81.232.52.161.1130350323.squirrel@81.232.52.161> hello, yesterday i set out to update some of the ports i've contributed. i started out with libglut and got some strange error from ld. after some tinkering i decided to try building the old port currently in contrib64 and got the same error: mklib: Making Linux shared library: libglut.so.3.7.1 /usr/bin/ld: /usr/X11R6/lib64/libGL.a(glapi.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/X11R6/lib64/libGL.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status and it _is_ compiled with -fPIC. pkginfo -o /usr/X11R6/lib64/libGL.a says x11 and to my knowledge i haven't installed anything overwriting that file (everything on my system is installed with ports btw). have anyone else seen this error and/or know what can be done about it? cheers, lars From darran.kartaschew at nusystems.com.au Sun Oct 2 23:45:16 2005 From: darran.kartaschew at nusystems.com.au (Darran Kartaschew) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:45:16 +1000 Subject: [Clc-crux64] CRUX x86_64 package confusion Message-ID: <46E4D8735224B042AA4723B77181080B133BD0@mailtemp.nusystems.com.au> Hi Guys, Just like to ask about the "libstdc++-compat" provided on the ISO. The one that I have (that comes with the ISO) appears to be a 32bit package? Is that correct? Over the past week or so, I have been trying to get the ATi drivers working on my system, and while the settings all appear to be correct the driver isn't loading. (even the X log shows it loading and initialising). After a bit of troubleshooting, I've found that the ATi driver required "libstdc++.so.5". Since a 64bit version doesn't exist on the system, the driver won't load... Is it possible to obtain a 64bit build of this library? (and the others included in the libstdc++-compat package)? Darran