May 2008 - crux-devel - lists.crux.nu

Potentially broken source downloads
by crux＠crux.nu 27 May '08

27 May '08

Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/psutils Url: ftp://ftp.enst.fr/pub/unix/a2ps/psutils-1.17.tar.gz Reason: curl: (67) Access denied: 530 State: Reminder Full report: http://crux.nu/files/check_urls.html

1 0

[CRUX][#283] pkgmk, build from existing work dir
by CRUX 26 May '08

26 May '08

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#283 - pkgmk, build from existing work dir User who did this - Bartlomiej Palmowski (mxq) ---------- Some developers already shown their opinion about this improvement (on the ML), which was negative, but they at least was able to say what they do not like about it, so it would be nice to say whats wrong or why you don't like it, instead of simply disagreeing. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=283#comment389 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[CRUX][#283] pkgmk, build from existing work dir
by CRUX 26 May '08

26 May '08

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#283 - pkgmk, build from existing work dir User who did this - Danny Rawlins (Romster) ---------- Bah you can't vote negatively for a feature or in this case i don't agree with... so that's meant to be a -1. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=283#comment388 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

prtverify daily results
by crux＠crux.nu 26 May '08

26 May '08

Differences since last check: (no differences) Full report: http://crux.nu/files/prtverify.log

1 0

prtverify daily results
by crux＠crux.nu 25 May '08

25 May '08

Differences since last check: (no differences) Full report: http://crux.nu/files/prtverify.log

1 0

Potentially broken source downloads
by crux＠crux.nu 25 May '08

25 May '08

Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/core/net-tools Url: http://www.tazenda.demon.co.uk/phil/net-tools/net-tools-1.60.tar.bz2 Reason: curl: (28) connect() timed out! State: New Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/lsof Url: ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/lsof_4.79.tar.bz2 Reason: curl: (19) Given file does not exist State: Changed reason Full report: http://crux.nu/files/check_urls.html

1 0

prtverify daily results
by crux＠crux.nu 24 May '08

24 May '08

Differences since last check: (no differences) Full report: http://crux.nu/files/prtverify.log

1 0

Potentially broken source downloads
by crux＠crux.nu 24 May '08

24 May '08

Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/lsof Url: ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/lsof_4.79.tar.bz2 Reason: curl: (8) This doesn't seem like a nice ftp-server response State: Changed reason Full report: http://crux.nu/files/check_urls.html

1 0

safe-env
by Jose V Beneyto 23 May '08

23 May '08

Hi people, As surely someone has known, pitillo and me are involved on developing a safe environment where test crux ports. Apparently, ATM don't exist a unified way for testing/developing ports. As we known, developers are using prtutils, chroot environments or unfortunately other are using their own crux system for building and testing their ports, and that sounds terrible in some cases. For that, we are working on 'safe-env', a environment similar to a "freshinstall", where testing ports and try to discover bugs, and also the most issues that crux users can find when they are building ports for their systems. We are trying to keep the environment as simple as possible (KISS), giving freedom to respect people's customs or preferences working daily with CRUX, but having the security of a minimal and secure environment. Surely we have errors or other things that can be done better, without doubt, but now our first objective is to know if CRUX people can see it like as a idea that can be done better in a future, and if it can be of benefit for all the community. The environment consist in 2 scripts: safe-env and prt-clean: - with safe-env we can build a "freshinstall" environment and play with it. - also, with prt-clean we can take snapshots at different moments of our environment and then delete ports between snapshots (taking first a freshinstall snapshot) Being minimal it can be flex and we can give it more uses, personally I'm using it to build uCRUX packages for my old 486 laptop, so I don't spend hours and hours compiling on it. Finally, we will glad to known your opinions/suggestions/etc about that. last release: http://mikeux.dyndns.org/crux/distfiles/safe-env-0.1-svn162.tar.bz2 svn repository: svn://mikeux.dyndns.org/safe-env/trunk Thanks in advance, and best regards, Jose V Beneyto

5 10

[CRUX][#283] pkgmk, build from existing work dir
by CRUX 23 May '08

23 May '08

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has been changed. The changes are listed below. For full information about what has changed, visit the URL and click the History tab. FS#283 - pkgmk, build from existing work dir User who did this: Bartlomiej Palmowski (mxq) Task details edited: ------- pkgmk build from existing work dir (would work well in conjunction with extract only #271), handy to check with the sources quickly modify by hand ,then build from modified sources, and then modify Pkgfile. It also gives a warning after succesful build and removes TARGET, just to be sure Pkgfile will be modified and checked. ------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=283 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0