Hello, btw Steve Volumetric wrote in <CABr5XP3GdSXdcGLX=WaPkXv-YD5WDuzrL6hNti+Xwe9vv82diA@mail.gmail.com>: said Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: crux.nu; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=lists.crux.nu Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=NhFzNPwB Authentication-Results: crux.nu; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: crux.nu; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com which surely is wrongly configured as i cannot imagine gmail DKIM signature to be wrong, and furthermore lists.crux goes to wherever and does whatever ie smtp.mailfrom=lists.crux.nu with SPF fail. Btw DMARC and SPF are [peep]. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)